Back

Lane County

· County

· Oregon

On-Call Professional Services Price Agreements

PROPOSALS DUE

October 07, 2026, 4:30 pm PDT

Closed

WHAT THEY WANT

(Summarized from the RFP)

Lane County, Oregon seeks qualified firms to establish multiple on-call price agreement contracts across eight professional service disciplines, used on an as-needed basis throughout county departments.

WHAT OTHERS ASKED

33 questions answered

▶

Would the County make exceptions regarding insurance requirements for this contract? Our policy aligns with most of the County's Insurance Coverages Required (Standard) form, but the form also includes some coverage (sex abuse/molestation) that is cost prohibitive for smaller or mid-sized firms.

Eligibility

▶

We would like to submit the following revisions to the contract for the County's review and consideration: - Section 3.2: Requested to strike “customarily” in order to provide for defined payment terms. -Exhibit B, Section 2.5: Request to qualify “attorney fees” as “reasonable” in order to align risk and avoid excessive fee claims. -Exhibit B, Section 2.6: Request to qualify “claims” as “third party” and to add the following: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any professional liability claim or lawsuit, this indemnity does not include providing the primary defense of Indemnitees, provided, however, Consultant shall be responsible for Indemnitees’ defense costs to the extent such costs are incurred as a result of Consultant’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct.” Professional liability policies pay defense costs out of the actual limits, not in addition to the limit. Rather than eroding the limit unnecessarily we want to preserve it for actual claims. Hence our reason for asking that we only be required to pay for reimbursement of actual cases where we are found to be liable. -Exhibit B, Section 3.9.1: Request to strike “an irrevocable, non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free license to use, reproduce, prepare derivative works based upon, distribute copies of, perform, and display the pre-existing elements of the Consultant Intellectual Property employed in any deliverable” and replace with “a license to the County for use in connection with the Services and the Work Product.” -Exhibit B, Section 5.2.3: We acknowledge only County may terminate the Agreement for convenience, but respectfully request mutual termination rights for breach by adding the following: “Consultant may stop work and/or terminate this Agreement upon 10 days’ written notice to County in the event County is in breach of any provision of this Agreement, and County fails to cure such breach during such 10-day period.” -Exhibit B, Section 6.3: Request for the prevailing party to be entitled to reimbursement for attorney fees, in line with industry standards.

Administrative

▶

Addendum #6 and #7 do not have any content.

Administrative

▶

RFP Section 2.3 Offers Accessibility Requirements: Would the County consider revising the last sentence to say, "If a Consultant-authored final deliverable is determined to contain accessibility deficiencies attributable to the Consultant, the Consultant shall remediate them"?

Administrative

▶

RFP Section 2.3 states that Offerors shall ensure that all electronic media provided in response to the solicitation comply with WCAG 2.1 Level AA and be compatible with commonly used assistive technologies. Can the County clarify whether this requirement applies to the proposal submission itself, to deliverables produced under the contract, or both?

Compliance · Scope/requirements

▶

Will an hourly rate escalation be permitted following Year 1 of the contract? If so, should the highest-ranking proposers be prepared to submit a rate table including Year 1 and Year 2 proposed rates?

Pricing

All 33 answers open with a free account.

ABOUT THIS RFP

RFP number

LC26023

Budget

Not Assigned

Published

Entity type

County

State

Oregon

Summarized from the Lane County portal.

HOW TO SUBMIT

Proposals must be submitted electronically through the Lane County Bid Locker website at https://bidlocker.us/a/lanecounty/BidLocker. Submissions must include a completed Offeror's Statements and Certifications Form signed by the offeror or its authorized representative, a completed Offeror's Qualifications and Rates Form (responses limited to five pages excluding resumes, with resumes limited to one page per representative), and a completed References Form. A separate Qualifications and Rates Form must be submitted for each service package being proposed. Late submissions will not be opened or considered. Questions related to scope of work must be submitted through the Bid Locker website's Questions/Answers module. All other solicitation-process questions may be directed by email to shawn.hubbell@lanecountyor.gov.

NAICS CODES & TAGS

541330

541211

541310

541620

541380

Architecture and Engineering Design

Environmental Consulting

Financial Audit and Accounting Services

Building Code Assessment

ACROSS 539 RFPS

MORE THAN

1 in 5

1 in 5

RFPs changed their terms while active.

A week of proposal work, based on the published terms.

A week of proposal work, based on the published terms.

DAY 1 · PUBLISHED

PUBLISHED

DAY 16 · THE TERMS CHANGE

DAY 16 · TERMS CHANGE

DAY 25 · DUE

DUE

25 days is the median window from publication to due date; day 16 is the median first change for the 113 that changed. 539 RFPs published and due: July 23 - Sept. 30, 2026.

Bid on five RFPs, and the odds are better than two in three that at least one changes its terms before the deadline. Larger firms have staff tracking this. Start free and you’ll have it at your fingertips too.

This RFP has closed

Proposals were due October 07, 2026, 4:30 pm PDT. Leads tracks active RFPs from posting to deadline.

"The efficiency of the Leads platform allows us to determine if an RFP is worth the effort in minutes rather than hours. The results speak for themselves, we recently won our first bid, which we initially found on Leads!"

Kiana Stringfield

Founder, AKOMAKONNECT

"The efficiency of the Leads platform allows us to determine if an RFP is worth the effort in minutes rather than hours. The results speak for themselves, we recently won our first bid, which we initially found on Leads!"

Kiana Stringfield

Founder, AKOMAKONNECT

A week of proposal work, based on the published terms.

A week of proposal work, based on the published terms.

Unlocking access to government contracts

one RFP at a time.

Sign up for RFP Insights

We'll send you RFP insights and relevant updates to help you gain a competitive edge.

© 2026 RFPGo.ai, All rights reserved

Unlocking access to government contracts one RFP at a time.

Sign up for RFP Insights

We'll send you RFP insights and relevant updates to help you gain a competitive edge.

© 2026 RFPGo.ai, All rights reserved

Unlocking access to government

contracts one RFP at a time.

Sign up for RFP Insights

We'll send you RFP insights and relevant updates to help you gain a competitive edge.

© 2026 RFPGo.ai, All rights reserved