Back

Lane County
· County
· Oregon
On-Call Professional Services Price Agreements
PROPOSALS DUE
October 07, 2026, 4:30 pm PDT
Closed
WHAT THEY WANT
(Summarized from the RFP)
Lane County, Oregon seeks qualified firms to establish multiple on-call price agreement contracts across eight professional service disciplines, used on an as-needed basis throughout county departments.
DOCUMENT SET
12 documents
· 1.5MB
Request for Proposals — full solicitation.pdf · 1.2MB
Addendum 1 — questions and answers.pdf · 210KB
Attachment A — scope of work and deliverables.pdf · 480KB
Attachment B — cost proposal form.xlsx · 64KB
Sample agreement and insurance requirements.pdf · 560KB
Pre-proposal meeting — sign-in sheet and slides.pdf · 1.8MB
More in the folder — every document opens with a free account.
CHANGES SINCE PUBLISHED
10 changes
▶
Addendum 10 - Questions and Answers.pdf
Q&A
▶
Addendum 9 - Questions and Answers(1).pdf
Administrative
▶
Addendum 8 - Questions and Answers(1).pdf
Pricing · Compliance · Scope/requirements · Administrative
▶
Addendum 7 - Questions and Answers(1).pdf
Administrative
▶
Addendum 6 - Questions and Answers(1).pdf
Administrative
▶
Addendum 5 - Questions and Answers.pdf
Q&A
All 10 changes summarized with a free account.
WHAT OTHERS ASKED
33 questions answered
▶
Would the County make exceptions regarding insurance requirements for this contract? Our policy aligns with most of the County's Insurance Coverages Required (Standard) form, but the form also includes some coverage (sex abuse/molestation) that is cost prohibitive for smaller or mid-sized firms.
Eligibility
▶
We would like to submit the following revisions to the contract for the County's review and consideration: - Section 3.2: Requested to strike “customarily” in order to provide for defined payment terms. -Exhibit B, Section 2.5: Request to qualify “attorney fees” as “reasonable” in order to align risk and avoid excessive fee claims. -Exhibit B, Section 2.6: Request to qualify “claims” as “third party” and to add the following: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any professional liability claim or lawsuit, this indemnity does not include providing the primary defense of Indemnitees, provided, however, Consultant shall be responsible for Indemnitees’ defense costs to the extent such costs are incurred as a result of Consultant’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct.” Professional liability policies pay defense costs out of the actual limits, not in addition to the limit. Rather than eroding the limit unnecessarily we want to preserve it for actual claims. Hence our reason for asking that we only be required to pay for reimbursement of actual cases where we are found to be liable. -Exhibit B, Section 3.9.1: Request to strike “an irrevocable, non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free license to use, reproduce, prepare derivative works based upon, distribute copies of, perform, and display the pre-existing elements of the Consultant Intellectual Property employed in any deliverable” and replace with “a license to the County for use in connection with the Services and the Work Product.” -Exhibit B, Section 5.2.3: We acknowledge only County may terminate the Agreement for convenience, but respectfully request mutual termination rights for breach by adding the following: “Consultant may stop work and/or terminate this Agreement upon 10 days’ written notice to County in the event County is in breach of any provision of this Agreement, and County fails to cure such breach during such 10-day period.” -Exhibit B, Section 6.3: Request for the prevailing party to be entitled to reimbursement for attorney fees, in line with industry standards.
Administrative
▶
Addendum #6 and #7 do not have any content.
Administrative
▶
RFP Section 2.3 Offers Accessibility Requirements: Would the County consider revising the last sentence to say, "If a Consultant-authored final deliverable is determined to contain accessibility deficiencies attributable to the Consultant, the Consultant shall remediate them"?
Administrative
▶
RFP Section 2.3 states that Offerors shall ensure that all electronic media provided in response to the solicitation comply with WCAG 2.1 Level AA and be compatible with commonly used assistive technologies. Can the County clarify whether this requirement applies to the proposal submission itself, to deliverables produced under the contract, or both?
Compliance · Scope/requirements
▶
Will an hourly rate escalation be permitted following Year 1 of the contract? If so, should the highest-ranking proposers be prepared to submit a rate table including Year 1 and Year 2 proposed rates?
Pricing
All 33 answers open with a free account.
ABOUT THIS RFP
RFP number
LC26023
Budget
Not Assigned
Published
Entity type
County
State
Oregon
Summarized from the Lane County portal.
HOW TO SUBMIT
Proposals must be submitted electronically through the Lane County Bid Locker website at https://bidlocker.us/a/lanecounty/BidLocker. Submissions must include a completed Offeror's Statements and Certifications Form signed by the offeror or its authorized representative, a completed Offeror's Qualifications and Rates Form (responses limited to five pages excluding resumes, with resumes limited to one page per representative), and a completed References Form. A separate Qualifications and Rates Form must be submitted for each service package being proposed. Late submissions will not be opened or considered. Questions related to scope of work must be submitted through the Bid Locker website's Questions/Answers module. All other solicitation-process questions may be directed by email to shawn.hubbell@lanecountyor.gov.
NAICS CODES & TAGS
541330
541211
541310
541620
541380
Architecture and Engineering Design
Environmental Consulting
Financial Audit and Accounting Services
Building Code Assessment
ACROSS 539 RFPS
MORE THAN
RFPs changed their terms while active.
25 days is the median window from publication to due date; day 16 is the median first change for the 113 that changed. 539 RFPs published and due: July 23 - Sept. 30, 2026.
Bid on five RFPs, and the odds are better than two in three that at least one changes its terms before the deadline. Larger firms have staff tracking this. Start free and you’ll have it at your fingertips too.
This RFP has closed
Proposals were due October 07, 2026, 4:30 pm PDT. Leads tracks active RFPs from posting to deadline.

